Tuesday, June 1, 2010

Housing approvals plummet, forces RBA's hand

Source: Real Estate Business

It seems the RBA’s decision to keep rates on hold was sound, as housing approvals endure the largest slump in almost a decade.

According to the ABS, there was a 14.8 per cent slow down in dwelling approvals in April.

The drop confirms previous industry warnings that the housing market would soften by the second half of this year and will push the national shortfall in housing supply past official estimates of 200,000 dwellings within months.

But while a drop in housing approvals was widely predicted, the slump far exceeded the forecasted 5 per cent decline.

The drop in housing approvals combined with a raft of other less positive economic data released over the last month, both domestically and internationally, persuaded the RBA to take a break from interest rate hikes.

Yesterday, the RBA decided to keep its cash rate at 4.5 per cent, snapping a series of three rate rises in as many months.

RP Data’s research analyst Cameron Kusher said the case for a rate pause was obvious.

“No doubt the RBA would have been happy to see the rate of property value growth slowing this month, with the RP Data-Rismark Home Value Index released on Monday showing that capital city property values increased by 0.2 per cent during April 2010. This release comes on the back of six months of falling housing finance commitments, weakening consumer sentiment results, a fluctuating share market and ongoing economic uncertainty in Europe. Given these factors, it becomes quite obvious as to why the RBA have decided not to raise interest rates this month, especially given that last month they indicated that rates were now back to ‘normal levels’,” Mr Kusher told The Adviser.

3 comments:

  1. Has anyone asked why approvals are so low? I have a theory - and it has nothing to do with people not wanting or able to build homes....my theory is that the banks just aren't lending for construction.

    My partner and I are well in the bracket of 'high income earners' and want to borrow the equivalant of 1.5 years income for construction of a new home.

    However The Bank devalued our existing properties by 35% on previous valuations. There is now a 50% difference between the valuations I have received in appraisals by real estate agents and those ordered by the bank.

    Result - our equity has effectively vaporised and now we can't build. We can afford to service the debt without a problem and they will happily lend us the equivalant of three years income to buy an existing house. But not to build a new one.

    The excuses they give me has something to do with risk management stratgies and lending policy. But despite being well versed in risk management and financial modelling I cannot work out how giving someone a loan 30% larger than what they want is a viable and feasible risk management strategy.

    I'd love someone to explain it to me because I just don't get it.

    And according to the agents in the region this is incredibly common at the moment. I doubt this is a regional trend therefore I would suggest that if you multiply this out nationally the result is rising prices for existing homes and plummeting bulding approvals. Oh....and isn't that what is happening?
    ReplyDelete
  2. I had the same issue Sarah, I simply shopped the loan around..Bank west allow you to use your own valuer and will lend 70% on finnished value.. worked for me but I agree some banks are reducing their risk..
    ReplyDelete
  3. Wow Sarah, thanks for such an in-depth and real look at how this is affecting people. Thanks Anon, it's always a good idea to shop around the banks and find the best deal for you.
    ReplyDelete